The chart below show the information about changalles people face when live in other countries Summaries the information by reporting main features and make comparison where possible

Essay topics:

The chart below show the information about changalles people face when live in other countries. Summaries the information by reporting main features and make comparison where possible.

The below chart provides data about difficulties people encounter when they start living abroad away from home land. These graph includes three most common problems such as making friends, finding place to live and learning new language, face by people of different age groups categories into three groups 18-34, 35-54 and 55 and above.
As an overall pattern young people find less difficulty in acquiring knowledge of other language and with increasing age this learning problem enhance. While making friends and search for space for living is not a big challenges with growing older.
Staying in other countries have diversity of challenges to over come, but different age group have different. According to information for young people between age of 18-34 most problematic condition is making friends which is 46 percent. While this percent decrease with age and 36 percent for people of age 35-54, and even more less for people above 55 year old 23 percent. A similar trend in case of accommodation searching young adults account 40 percent, middle age 39 percent and older people percentage is 22 percent.
However, in learning new language reverse situation found as people of age group 18-34 can quite easily learn local language with difficulty of 29 percent. While with growing this thing become serious challenge with 35percent for 34-54 year old and 54 percent for 55 and above.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not a big challenges with growing older Staying in other countries have diversit...
^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'less' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: less
...percent for people of age 3554 and even more less for people above 55 year old 23 percent...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06167400881 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42229868202 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563876651982 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 227.0 22.4926829268 1009% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1149.0 112.824112599 1018% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 227.0 22.9334400587 990% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 32.0 5.23603664747 611% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130953866463 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130953866463 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863473103442 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549972672023 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 115.9 13.2329268293 876% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -150.47 61.2550243902 -246% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 90.6 10.3012195122 880% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.55 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.96 8.06136585366 223% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.4329268293 481% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 92.8 10.9970731707 844% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 93.0 11.0658536585 840% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.