Local people don't go very often to museum or historical sites. What can be done to change this situation. Give reasons and example from relevant experience.
The historical places and museum located within country occasionally visited by countryman that is because of they find it less attractive. This is because of mostly locals are not suitable marketing target by companies officials and this trend can be change by special offers and publicity about these area. In this essay we are going to discuss some reasons why local population less likely tours their own history related sites and exhibition and some measures to diverge local traffic toward it.
The regions which are associated with particular country history and museum where cultural items presented are least preferable by nationals rather than international. This is because for tour operators and companies foreign people are important market place because they bring a lot of money as profit. Therefore, officials presents historical sites as desirable site for sales by well photographs and information about it, while reputable organizations with better quality services preference is not local traveler. And below average companies operate national tourism with many bad services which leads to bad experience by one and example for many others.
How can we change locals perception and encourage them to visit historic and cultural sites by providing international level facilities to nationals by large operating organizations. But this thing brings another problem related to cost that mostly people unable to bear. In such situation special discount offers and allocating small number of places for locals along with their foreign visitors at lesser prices can effectively diverge this happening. And government can only give work permit to recognized companies which tackle both local and international tourism.
In conclusion, historical sites and museum are often least desirable choice to visit and mostly vacant from locals. The reasons are tourism is costly and for nationals its not up to standards because of companies donor target them. This could be solved by providing standard services at lower prices by bounding large tour operational organizations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
...asionally visited by countryman that is because of they find it less attractive. This is becaus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'these areas'?
Suggestion: this area; these areas
...e by special offers and publicity about these area. In this essay we are going to discuss ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the least'.
Suggestion: are the least
...d museum where cultural items presented are least preferable by nationals rather than int...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...are tourism is costly and for nationals its not up to standards because of companie...
^^^
Line 4, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g large tour operational organizations.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54545454545 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75295085617 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576802507837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9687907502 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.357142857 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274103800261 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885828377157 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462310371631 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167370516557 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429802746583 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.