The chart below show what UK graduate and post graduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the number of British university students (graduates and postgraduates) did after completing education and not opting into permanent work in the year 2008.
Overall, it is clear from the chart that maximum undergraduates from the UK opted to go for further studies. Additionally, minimum number participated in voluntary services. Regarding the UK postgraduate students, large number were observed choosing to do further studies and part-time work. Moreover, less PG students opted to provide voluntary services as compared to graduate students in the given period.
On the one hand, in 2008 an upward trend was noted among graduates pursuing further studies (29,665). Focusing on temporary employment, 17,735 students were noted doing it. In addition, almost similar trend was observed for undergraduate learners remaining unemployed at 16,235 in 2008. However, a minimum of 3,500 students opted for voluntary work.
On the other hand, the number of PG learners showed an upward trend in choosing further studies at 2,725. Looking at the part-time employment 2,535 students enrolled in doing it and 1625 PG remained unemployed. In contrast, only 345 students chose to participate in voluntary services in above mentioned period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...625 PG remained unemployed. In contrast, only 345 students chose to participate i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, moreover, regarding, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59473684211 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9262637254 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584210526316 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8525947225 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5833333333 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180007887807 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654354160381 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633890261499 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129861191144 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076350506584 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.