The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are two bar charts that compare the four alternatives for undergraduate students and postgraduate students who did not have full-time employment after their graduation in 2008.
To begin, the majority of undergraduate students (nearly 30000) decided to continue their education at the university. By contrast, the number of undergraduate students who did volunteer works was much lower than those who decided to study. Meanwhile, the number of undergraduate students who remained unemployment after graduation and those decided to do part-time time were similar, at 17735 and 16235 respectively.
On the other hand, the postgraduate students appeared to have a different trend in their life after graduation. The number of postgraduate students decided to take further study and did part-time work was about 2600 each, which was more than the unemployed student by 1000. By contrast, there were only 345 students who did volunteer work after graduation.
It is evident that postgraduate students were more likely to get full-time employment, and voluntary work was the least popular options for university students after their graduation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6724137931 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05978220504 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1835598028 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.375 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276175437958 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145313153115 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712558347652 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200969219448 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559655276935 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.