The chart below shows the amount of money per person per week spent on fast food in Britain. The graph shows the trend in consumption of fast food.
The given both bar and line charts and line graph illustrate the information about the expenditure on fast food by different age groups in Britain and display used up hamburger, fish and chips, and pizza from 1970 to 1990.
Overall, hamburger is popular fast food because most of the people spend a lot of money on it as well it was trending food. The data is given in pence per person per week and grammes.
At the first glance, the high and average income group spend the highest money on hamburger that is more than two fifths and around a third pence per person per week. The middle favorite food of British people is fish and chips. The high and low-income group spend same amount of money on it that is less than a fifth but average income group spend a quarter amount on it. Last but not least food is pizza which is very popular in high income group than low-income group, the expenditure on it, that is 20 pence and less than 10 pence per person per week.
Probing further, the consumption of fish and chips started around 300 grammes in 1970 after that it decreased gradually in given period of passage it reached at 200 grammes in 1985 then it rose slowly from 1985 to 1990 and reached just above 200 grammes. Moreover, hamburger initiated from just below 100 in 1970 it inclined drastically and surpassed fish and chips in between 1980 to 1985 then it was continue rise. After that, peaked as above 500 grammes in 1990. Meanwhile, in 1970 to half 1985 , the least intake food was pizza, it began as around near about 50 grammes in 1970 than remained stable in 1980 after that it climbed suddenly before last year it surpassed to fish and chips and became second popular food it reached at just below 300 grammes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 383, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'not the least'.
Suggestion: not the least
... spend a quarter amount on it. Last but not least food is pizza which is very popular in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 403, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'continued'.
Suggestion: continued
...ips in between 1980 to 1985 then it was continue rise. After that, peaked as above 500 g...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 498, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...in 1990. Meanwhile, in 1970 to half 1985 , the least intake food was pizza, it beg...
^^
Line 13, column 603, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 50 grammes in 1970 than remained stable in 1980 after that it climbed suddenly b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, third, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 314.0 196.424390244 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54777070064 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18246984015 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458598726115 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.8023114322 43.030603864 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.818181818 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5454545455 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260960109733 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107923520118 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079379051038 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183568973589 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110296874746 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.