The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales( in various formats) of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart illustrates the rentals and sales of movies of different categories from a particular store in one year from 2002 to 2011.
At first glance, it is evident that the sales of DVDs remain highest in the year with the exception of the first two years of data.
From the charts, There were no any sales of Blu-ray until 2006, whereas there was a decreasing trends of rentals, which was nearly 180,000 per year in 2002. Sales of DVDs rose significantly from 85,000 in 2002 to 210,000 in 2006. Whoever, sales of VHS showed a downward trend and sales declined to nearly 10,000 in 2005 before reaching zero in 2006.
After 2007, sales of DVDs had declined to 180,000 in 2011, after it reached to a peak with a sales of nearly 205,000 in 2007. Rentals followed a similar trend as a previous year and reached to the lowest sales of nearly 60,000 in 2011. Sales of Blu-ray gradually increased from 2007 and 15,000 were sold per year in 2011. There were no any sales of VHS from 2006 to 2011.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ales of DVDs remain highest in the year with the exception of the first two years of data. From th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...of data. From the charts, There were no any sales of Blu-ray until 2006, wherea...
^^
Line 7, column 334, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... were sold per year in 2011. There were no any sales of VHS from 2006 to 2011.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49456521739 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22971188175 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494565217391 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7915225419 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8888888889 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176024804489 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974631992493 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637452505646 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130301836933 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862904085759 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.