The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales (in various formats) of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the measurement number of sales in terms of various kind of films from a particular store in the years 2002 and 2011. Overall, from four different forms of film, rentals and DVD players were the more popular one than the rest throughout the years.
In 2002, rentals started with really high number of sales, which was just above 180.000. The following year, the sales decreased slightly, and actually, the sales experienced a steady decline until 2011 ( ended with around 50.000 of sales ). VHS sales was the second highest after rentals in 2002, and also reduced until reached the lowest sales of around 10.000 in 2005 and never had any income from VHS after that.
DVD was the least popular back in 2002, however, gained popularity among people and even achieved the highest sales in 2007 with approximately 210.000 sales. After that, the number kept decreasing until 2011. Lastly, blu ray was first discovered in early 2007, therefore, only had very little number of sales and eventually increased stably within 4 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... experienced a steady decline until 2011 ended with around 50.000 of sales . VHS ...
^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... 2011 ended with around 50.000 of sales . VHS sales was the second highest after ...
^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: BLU_RAY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'Blu-ray'?
Suggestion: Blu-ray
...ber kept decreasing until 2011. Lastly, blu ray was first discovered in early 2007, the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, lastly, really, second, so, therefore, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02298850575 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30841583634 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.071478826 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221835590578 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109227724092 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920807152555 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16694490131 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803845392328 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.