The chart below shows the average percentages of typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrating the USA’s typical meals' average nutritional which all led to certain health issue if consumed by high amount.
Overall, nutritional factors divided into three categories namely sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar, to display the average value of breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks. it is clear that people tend to use more sodium and saturated fat contained food at dinner (43% and 37% relatively) and added sugar consumption is maximized in snacks (42%). On the other hand, breakfast value is the lowest of all three nutrition (sodium 14%, saturated fat 16%, and added sugar 16%).
Furthermore, sodium content shows the smallest value in both breakfast and snacks (both 14%) yet a high amount contained at the dinner and the lunch, taking more than 72% together (dinner 43% and lunch 29%). Also, saturated fat content displaying relatively less difference in each meal, less than 21% between dinner and breakfast. Consuming added sugar data giving that people in the USA, eat food with less sugar in breakfast.
Additionally, dinner is the most unbalanced food because of a too high content of saturated fat (37%) and sodium (43%) and snack is the next unhealthy meal due to its highest amount of added sugar (42%).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 176, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...f breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks. it is clear that people tend to use more s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52431466979 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3730669589 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0789961364054 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045105174022 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509072984922 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726100817209 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568790885971 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.