The chart below shows the changes in gross domestic product (GDP) in the Western Cape between 2000 and 2010.
The graph illustrates the percentage variation in gross domestic product (GDP) in the Western Cape over the period of ten years ranging from 2000 to 2010. Overall, GDP remained stable with a slight increase between 2003 and 2004 but an abrupt fall can be observed after 2007. That fall continues up to 2009 after which GDP once again started to rise quickly.
From 2000 to 2003, annual GDP growth remained roughly the same with little fluctuations between 4 and 3.3 percent. It rose slightly from 3.3% to 5.5% during the duration between 2003 and 2004. After that, it again plateaued for next three years and peaked at 6% in 2007. It is also interesting to see that although there are some downfalls in GDP growth rate, but the overall trend is increasing over the first half of period ranging from 2000 to 2007.
In 2007, a sudden decline in the percentage can be observed. It drops down from its peak value of 6% to all the way up to -1.5% in just next two years. The negative percentage represents the annual reduction in GDP instead of growth. Finally, after hitting the lowest value in history, GDP in the Western Cape has again started to rise in a quick manner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a quick manner" with adverb for "quick"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... Western Cape has again started to rise in a quick manner.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6028708134 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31605637277 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574162679426 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9530972628 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4545454545 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222012207811 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815119263375 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975366653358 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156716138208 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808175496433 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.