The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram illustrates how the rates of crime in burglary, car theft and robbery in Panama city changed over a 9-year period, between 2010 and 2019.
In general, the highest rates of crime were in burglary and car theft while robbery had a much lower rate of crime. However, the number of incidents in robbery and car theft fluctuated over the time frame whereas one in burglary declined dramatically.
First of all, the figure of car thefts and robberies stayed almost the same from 2010 to 2019, standing at around 2500 and 800 incidents in term. Nevertheless, between 2013 and 2016, the crime rate in car theft witnessed a slight decrease by approximately 500 incidents, then recovered and leveled off in 2019. Regarding the number of burglary incidents, although it was significantly high in 2010, hit 3500 incidents in that year, the next five-year period saw a remarkable drop in the crime rate, from more than 3500 to 1000 incidents. From 2016 onwards, it remained steady at fewer than 1500 incidents each year.
To sum up, the number of criminal incidents has different trends at three areas over the period shown.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('remarkably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('drop') instead of another adjective.
...hat year, the next five-year period saw a remarkably drop in the crime rate, from more than 3500 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, then, whereas, while, in general, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88659793814 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58859389735 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582474226804 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1426150114 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.75 5.23603664747 244% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138092907652 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679046121976 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425610181893 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992213571952 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426614129132 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.