The chart below shows the changes that took places in three areas of crime in Newport City from 2003 to 2012.
The line graph given illustrates the information about the alterations for three various criminal field, namely burglary, car theft and robbery in the inner city over the course of 9 years from 2003 to 2012.
In general, the number of burglaries showed a downward trend, whereas the quantities of car theft and robbery fluctuated relatively.
In 2003, the figure for housebreaking occurrences was highest, approximately 3400, while the quantity for car theft was slightly lower, about 2800 incidents. At this point, the rate of robbery cases was the lowest, at only about 600.
As for the burglaries, it dramatically declined in 2008, just over 1100 incidents, after growing slightly and peaking at 3800 cases in 2004. Subsequently, there was a gradual oscillation in this illegal act between 2008 and 2012. By contrast, there was a significant drop in the proportion of car theft, just over 2000 instances, after remaining steady in the last two years. Next 6 years, this figure for car theft moderately rose and continued to reach a peak at 2700 cases in 2012. Meanwhile, the robberies witnessed a period of small volatility and hardly any change during the 9 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'field' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'fields'.
Suggestion: fields
... alterations for three various criminal field, namely burglary, car theft and robbery...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, as for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0829015544 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82445684061 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611398963731 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.809790358 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0915334945562 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385063496672 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455412964929 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647156939211 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539084768372 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.