The graph below shows the number of students from four different countries enrolled at Avago Language School in Sydney.
Between 1990 and 2000 the composition of the student body changed and the Asian economic crisis seriously affected the overall number of students in 1997-1998
The graph gives data about how many adjustment students came from various cities, registered to Arago Language School in Sydney from 1990 to 2000.
In general, the number of Asian students joined at this school had an upturn.
During and Korea went up similarly, about 50. Subsequently, there was a remain stable in pupils Japan before increasing in about 65, between 1995 and 2002. Meanwhile, the Korean students also rise slightly, around 25 after reaching the greatest, about 125, in 1997.
It could be seen the graph, the students from Korea remained constant and then, this figure reached the lowest point at 25 in 2000. In contrast, there was a dramatic rise in the number of students from China after reaching a low point, at 150 and 0 respectively.
To sum up, there was an appearance both Chinese students and Korean students entered in the Language school until 1995 and the student enrollment numbers rose dramatically in over 10 years. The period from 1990 to 1995, both the number of students came from Japan
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...arly, about 50. Subsequently, there was a remain stable in pupils Japan before increasin...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, similarly, so, then, while, in contrast, in general, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89655172414 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46366111843 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8559650057 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337207035643 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144048278101 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904981137084 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198004185046 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081786190241 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.