The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The table given illustrates the information about the sales figures of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana in five different nations, namely the U.K, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden over the course of 5 years from 1999 to 2004.
Overall, the sale of Fairtrade coffee increased in all countries whereas there only had a growth of selling bananas in three out of the five countries.
Fairtrade coffee and bananas, at 3 million and 15 million respectively. By 2004, however, there was a change of position between U.K and Switzerland in the sales of Fairtrade coffee. It was the soar to €20 million, and this was over three times higher than Switzerland’s sales figure in that year. The year 2004 also saw a jump in the expenditure on Fairtrade bananas in Switzerland and U.K, with revenues rising by 32 million and 4.5 million respectively.
Regarding two products of Fairtrade, the revenue in Denmark, Belgium and Sweden saw a lower number. Small increases in sales of Fairtrade coffee can be seen, but revenue remained at €2 million or below in all three countries in both years. Finally, it is noticeable that the money spent on Fairtrade bananas fell slightly in Sweden and Denmark.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...in five different nations, namely the U.K, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium, and Swe...
^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...here was a change of position between U.K and Switzerland in the sales of Fairtra...
^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
... Fairtrade bananas in Switzerland and U.K, with revenues rising by 32 million and...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, regarding, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08040201005 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98377386748 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582914572864 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3997335066 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343768071602 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137322206281 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114379086814 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227422822772 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111305092479 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.