Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
It is true that nowadays tourists, but not local residents, are the most frequent visitors to historical areas and museums. This trend happens due to several reasons, but various measures can be taken to address this.
There are several reasons as to why tourists, instead of the local people, come to museums and historical places. Firstly, since local museums and historical sites do not anything fresh, the locals find these places monotonous. In fact, these places do not stagger their curiosity as they have gained a wealth of knowledge about history or art at school. Thus, they tend to discover something new to experience. Secondly, museum and historical sites are not cheap to visit. Truly, to get admission to these places, visitors are often required to buy expensive tickets.
In order to spit up more interest of local people in coming to visit the Museums, number of ways can be employed. First of all, scholastic, extracurricular activities with respect to museums should be executed in order to stimulate children's amenity of history. Second, multi-media should make public for historical sites and museums to exhort people to visit them. Last, authority should spend more money on conserving and maintaining their aesthetic, historical and cultural values to attract tourists. In addition, passes for entry to these museums and historical sites could be arranged for local people so that it does not cut a hole in their pocket every time when they visit them. And they could be fixed every month when their entry to the museum is made free.
To conclude, many reasons can be given as to why local people lose their enthusiasm for the museum and places of historical importance. However, I believe that historical landmarks, like museums, monuments... will become the most fascinating destination if administered well.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, as to, in addition, in fact, first of all, it is true, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18791946309 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68821898808 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570469798658 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.923314485 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9411764706 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447269261408 0.244688304435 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133218251599 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103534458013 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249094325789 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602847793842 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.