Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?

Essay topics:

Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?

The international tourism industry is booming right now. People like to visit countries with diverse culture and monumental places. Many countries have a very rich ancient heritage and therefore are subject to a popular tourist place. The sad truth behind this is that these places are usually not visited by the local people. This essay states some techniques on how to help this situation.

The reason for the locals not visiting these heritage places can be felt by many. These historical heritage sites and museums are not new for the local people. They are brought up in the surroundings of these sites. There are a lot of lucrative opportunities for making money from foreign tourists rather than visiting it. The fees are usually higher compared to the average income and reducing the entry fees can help attract more local people to visit the museums and other heritage places. Taking India as an example, the Indian government reduced the entry fees for Taj Mahal visit to zero, making it basically free. This decision resulted in a boost in local visitors from around the Taj Mahal.

To help solve this situation, the Government should launch a campaign specifically for the local public. The local public may have seen the museum many times but may not realise the historical importance revolving around it. These campaigns can help people understand the vital role of these museums and heritage sites in developing the overall land area. Ultimately, this will lead to an increase in local visitors to these landmarks.

In Conclusion, raising awareness about these places to the locals and reducing the visiting fees can significantly increase the local visitor count.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14130434783 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5161810938 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4791082475 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4705882353 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2352941176 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.47058823529 7.06120827912 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467031411891 0.244688304435 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148427850604 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09957581934 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286517705454 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448852001568 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.