It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different views about the studying of focus on local history and world history in school. Personally, I support the idea that children should study first and foremost the great historical events of their own countries. The purpose of this essay is to analyze the controversy in more depth.
There are several reasons why I believe that school should focus on teaching national history. Researching the history of their own country is one of the ways for the youth to understand their origin. One reason for this is that it helps children connect with the past and learn about the sacrifices the past generations made to create a vibrant present. For instance, my country's history told these stories the children how the soldiers made sacrifices to protect the territorial sovereignty of the country. Therefore, the loves for the homeland has been formed from the history's lessons that each kid learned at school.
One cannot deny that pupils enjoy learning about where they live. Especially when we consider that the huge number of young groups starts to develop a sense of identity by researching the culture, and history of their own countries. The recent statistics show that there is an increasing number of historical buildings that have been embellished by enthusiastic and patriotic young architects. It is understandable that the local history subjects should continue to maintain in the educational institutions if the government want to build and develop the country sustainable.
In conclusion, I strongly agreed with remembering the source through the local history that the children learned in school. In addition, the subjects are really useful to attract youth researching and from that, they contribute many benefits in developing their country.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, really, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3074204947 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77302096451 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551236749117 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6322516903 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.285714286 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19226113382 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670910422472 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555030078837 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114477692662 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268819053392 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.