The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart gives information about post-school qualifications in Australia by both men and women in 1999.
It is clear that the qualification held by men the most was skilled vocational diploma with over 90%. Whereas the percentage of women who held this diploma was 10%. Undergraduate diploma was the most held one by women however, it was the least held one by men respectively with over 70% and 40%. Bachelor's degree was also held by the majority of women but as a distinct from women, only 50% of men held this diploma.
Even though the postgraduate diploma was the second most held by men with 70%, it was not held by most of the women. Master’s degree was held by a large proportion of both women and men. 60% of men and 40% of women held this diploma.
The overall picture is that each qualification had different percentages of post-school qualifications from both genders. Also some of the diplomas were held the most by men and the least held by women.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...illed vocational diploma with over 90%. Whereas the percentage of women who held this d...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...chool qualifications from both genders. Also some of the diplomas were held the most...
^^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... qualifications from both genders. Also some of the diplomas were held the most by men and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70175438596 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77445784985 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456140350877 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1567671125 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253920634116 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145294079832 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074004885237 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219917042597 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826126847846 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.