The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006.
The histogram gives information about computerized games on global trade which were classified in four types from 2000 till 2006.
To begin with, it is clear by analysing bar graph that, during first year, only two of games were purchased by masses which included handhelds (6 billion dollars) and console games (11billion dollar). However, online games were added with previous couple of games with little value of 2 billion which was calculated during era of 2001. Yet, another two play sets were increased with 3 billion. On contrast, selling of handheld was proliferated with 15 billion in comparison to other thrice games during 2002. Additionally, mobile phone and online plays were at similar count, yet console games were decreased from 4 billion.
Furthermore, in eras of 2003 and 2004, handheld plays were purchased with difference of only a billion. Similarly, console games were sold at same number. In 2003, other two games included mobile phone and online, these were sold with little difference. Yet during 2004, couple of these were purchased at same amount of 4 billion. Apart from that, during second last year (2005), selling of online and mobile phone games was maximised upto 6 billion. However, other twice of games were sold alike previous years. Lastly in 2006, handhelds were increased rapidly upto 18 billion. Once more, mobile phone and online games were also enhanced at selling with difference of 2 billion.
Overall, during all years, handheld games were sold at higher amount rather than others. On contrast, other thrice types of plays were represented fluctuation in their values.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...epresented fluctuation in their values.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, second, similarly, so, apart from, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19540229885 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43786573151 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501915708812 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 283.868780488 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3017682808 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.75 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125231069035 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559395680946 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482527120669 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105565901525 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679947023506 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.