The chart below shows the growth in population of some of the world's largest cities. Summarise the information given and make comparisons where relevant
The charts illustrate the population growth of 5 cities (Tokyo, New York, Shanghai, Bombay, and Jakarta) in three different years (1990, 2010 and 2030). It also depicts the division of World’s population into Urban and Rural areas.
In the year 1990, maximum population was encountered in Tokyo (little bit greater than 15 million) and least in Jakarta (around 3 million). The population of New York (14.5 million) was slightly less than that of Tokyo. Also population of Shanghai (around 12 million) is more than double than that of Bombay (5 million). Along with that population in rural and urban area displayed a gradual increase with a population of 3 billion and 2 billion respectively.
Tokyo again topped in the ranking chart of 2010 with a population of around 24 million. Jakarta’s population was tripled than the year 1990 which was around 9 million. Population of Shanghai and New York showed a little increase by around 2 million and 1 million respectively. Bombay’s population in 2010 was same as that of Shanghai in 1990. In the year 2010, population in urban area’s showed a sudden increase while the population in rural area was becoming steady.
The population of Bombay and Jakarta in 2030 will project a massive increase in there population from 12 million to 26 million and from 9 million to 18 million respectively. Population of Tokyo and Shanghai reached at 28 million and 18 million respectively. Also there was a slight increase of 1 million population in New York from 15.5 million to 16.5 million approximately.
Hence the world’s population is increasing with increasing in time, especially in urban areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...mum population was encountered in Tokyo little bit greater than 15 million and least in Ja...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...n was slightly less than that of Tokyo. Also population of Shanghai around 12 millio...
^^^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...28 million and 18 million respectively. Also there was a slight increase of 1 millio...
^^^^
Line 4, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... million to 16.5 million approximately. Hence the world’s population is increasi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...lion to 16.5 million approximately. Hence the world’s population is increasing wi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing in time, especially in urban areas.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 3.97073170732 453% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0442804428 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87114750055 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.409594095941 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8906153983 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1333333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.73333333333 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117523355976 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618825321708 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030606977139 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936171558176 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043482564624 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.