The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar chart illustrates how often people visited fast food restaurants in order to eat there in the USA in three different years. All measures in percentages.
Overall, it can be seen that predominant proportion of people ate in fast food restaurants once or twice a week while there were people who never ate in fast food restaurants.
In 2003, people who ate in Fast food restaurants several times a week or once a week accounted for about 17% and 32% respectively, then for next three years the percentage rose steadily to 20% (several times a week) and approximately 32.5%. (Once a week). However, they both then decreased for 5% in 2013. Once or twice a week comprised of 30% in 2003 then the percentage fell to 25% in 2006 before increasing exponentially to 32.5 in 2013.
A few times a year stood at 12.5% in 2006 year then the percentage grew marginally to 15% in 2006 and remained at the same level in 2013. People who visited fast food restaurants to eat every day and people who never visited them accounted below 5% in all three years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...l times a week and approximately 32.5%. Once a week. However, they both then decreas...
^^^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hey both then decreased for 5% in 2013. Once or twice a week comprised of 30% in 200...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59042553191 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71184277158 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7902519652 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8888888889 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319622637737 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119881516108 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111361145859 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213562310146 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663786841321 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.64 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.