The chart below shows male and female fitness membership in Thailand between 1985 and 2015.
The bar chart highlights the data about the number of males and females who participated in fitness membership in Thailand from 1985 to 2015.
It can be seen that the number of female fitness members was increased over the period but this number decreased for male ones. Overall, the year 2010 witnessed a considerable rise in both the number of male and female fitness members.
In 1985, the number of male members who participated in fitness was much higher than female ones with approximately 2200 and 1300 members, respectively. Over the next six years, both the proportion of men and women went up and down significantly. In 1990, male fitness members number increased to nearly 4000 which was double compared to the 1985's total male number. The fitness female members also rose this year and reached about 2000. Notwithstanding, there was a substantial decrease in the number of men in 1995 at around 2500 members while the number of females fell slightly in the same year.
According to survey data, the year 2000 witnessed a moderate rise in the number of women fitness members and the figure was much higher than total men number. The proportion of men involved in fitness membership was nearly the same as that of female ones. Although men's fitness members reached a peak at 5000, the data plummeted in 2015, and female members were twice as high as male ones.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84680851064 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5702832173 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472340425532 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0560242349 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.545454545 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266203393244 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135439653869 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110940870676 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231686892509 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120064261756 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.