The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labeled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two given tables provide data about how much money was spent on buying coffee and bananas labeled Fairtrade in five countries in Europe over five years from 1999 to 2004.
As can be seen from the sales data of coffee, the figure increased sharply for almost all countries, except for Sweden. While in the amount of money spent on bananas, Switzerland had a more significant growth than any other country.
Looking at coffee’s turnover, Switzerland earned 3 million euro from selling this commodity in 1999, followed by around 1.5 and 1.8 million euro in the UK and Denmark, respectively. The lowest figure was seen in Sweden at 0.8 million. After five years, the UK became the highest income from purchasing coffee, reaching 15 million euros. The earnings of other countries climbed by about 0.2 to 3 million only.
Regarding banana sales, the UK always ranked top, recording 20 million in 1999 and 47 million euros in 2004, which increased threefold after five years. Belgium also experienced a growth in its sales from 1.7 to 4 million euro while Switzerland decreased marginally to 5.5 million in 2004. Nonetheless, the data for Sweden witnessed a hover at 1 million in both years, and Denmark has shown a relative fall to 0.9 million euros through five years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...etheless, the data for Sweden witnessed a hover at 1 million in both years, and Denmark...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, nonetheless, regarding, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93023255814 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5376600968 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8167857627 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132065107192 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591904410775 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731083991913 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102642392666 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938933476022 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.