Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old houses in local areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own style. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The debate surrounding houses is one of the most charged in construction. On the one hand, there is an army of people convinced that the latest houses should be built the same as old ones within local spaces. On the other, a host of progressives protest that people ought to be permitted to build accommodations in the style that they are interested in. As I shall argue, the first position is short-sighted and simply not true.
Advocates of the idea that it is necessary for houses to follow the same design have ample justifications for their beliefs. One of the primary reasons is that it lends a distinctive look to the local area, hence the local range can attract various tourists, become a favorable destination for travelers and boost residents' income. Moreover, the uniformity of the houses gives an impression of equality. By forcing people to prevent building grand houses to demonstrate their affluent, their houses will not stand out that much, and fewer residents should feel inferior to another.
On the other flip side, the government should not hinder individuals from constructing their houses according to their preferences and desire. To begin with, only by erecting convention houses may several people feel uncomfortable and inconvenient within the space they reside in. This claim is substantiated by the fact that should citizens be not allowed to create houses in their own style, migration will happen and the population in each region will decrease considerably. In addition, houses can be a reflection of their owner's personality, their rights would be violated if they were made to live in a house whose aesthetic style was not of their interest. Finally, the image of the local area would be much more diverse if each house was built differently.
In conclusion, there was a number of fundamental surrounding by erecting houses the same as ancient ones. In my opinion, I suppose that constructing several novel and unique houses might make residents feel more enjoyable and attract many visitors to come to their local range.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n is short-sighted and simply not true. Advocates of the idea that it is necessa...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, if, look, may, moreover, so, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84161487301 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541176470588 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4748458562 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469445510105 0.244688304435 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150279681738 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728059132042 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27953024723 0.151304729494 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670124099728 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.