The chart below shows male and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000 in some land.
The chart illustrates male and female fitness members of some land recorded between the years 1970 and 2000.
Overall, more male species were a part of fitness membership than women throughout the time period. Both gender's membership rates fluctuate, the interesting thing to notice is that at the start of the period woman showed the least interest, but during the last year woman were more in number than men.
Woman’s fitness membership was about 1000 in 1970, is lower than men’s rate by approximately 1000 the same year. Then, the number rose to 2000 in 1975. However, there was a slight decline of 200 women (making the total around 1800 respectively) in 1980. During the years 1985 and 1995, the rate remains stable around 2800, which was recorded the highest number of women taking fitness membership. When talking about the years 1990 and 2000, the number dropped to around 2000.
Memberships of men were just above 2000 in 1970, and it skyrockets to 4000 during the year 1975. However, the figure shows the decrease to about 2500 in 1980 and continues to decline at just under 2000 during the next five years period. In contrast, the following ten years showed an upward trend making 5000 members in 1995, which was considered the highest recorded number for men. However, the number suddenly dropped to 1000 members in the year 2000.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, then, in contrast, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93013100437 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28156640917 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519650655022 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.533936399 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0833333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275524967758 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11894655848 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140726793753 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234574084942 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.191811246768 0.0819641961636 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.