The chart below shows Morocco's income from different economic sectors in 2003 as well as its income from fishing from 1982 to 2003.
The pie chart compares 6 economic aspects of Morocco in 2003. While the given bar chart shows incomes in US billions from fishing over a period of 21 years from 1982.
Overall, the proportions of fishing is in medium level and there is significant difference in percentages of 6 sections. Additionally, the quantity of fishing earnings has an up-ward trend.
In 2003, the proportions of fishing was 13% which was in 5th place. Meanwhile, its of agriculture account for 2% which is the smallest proportions. Having said that Morocco was famous for travelling as the data for tourism reached a peak of 26%, was 13 times greater than its for agriculture. Furthermore, the sum of the percentages of agriculture and industry exactly equaled to its of tourism.
It was obvious that the fishing income began with a number almost zero, just only 0.3 US billions then it climbed considerably over years. For more details, the number of fishing revenue in 1993 was 1.9 US billions which was about 6 times greater than the first data. After that, the fishing income increased gradually until it reached a peak of 4.3 US billions in 2000. Then, it showed a slightly decline to 1.8 US billions in 2003. Especially, the fishing revenue in 2001 was as same as its in 2002, around 3.8 US billions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... 6 economic aspects of Morocco in 2003. While the given bar chart shows incomes in U...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 2003. While the given bar chart shows incomes in US billions from fishing over...
^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... 13% which was in 5th place. Meanwhile, its of agriculture account for 2% which is ...
^^^
Line 7, column 388, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
....3 US billions in 2000. Then, it showed a slightly decline to 1.8 US billions in 2003. Especially...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82432432432 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73972021887 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8915906395 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3846153846 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0769230769 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.69230769231 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268551808143 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980136333192 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950363980118 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186569768012 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168303866364 0.0819641961636 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.