The chart below shows the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australian's share of the Japanese tourist market.
The barb graph illustrates the information about the quantity of tourist travelling overseas in Japan from 1985 to 1995 and the units are measured in million while line graph demonstrates the Australian's share in the Japan tourist market.
Overall, the Japanese like travelling abroad is relatively increased in the given period and also the Australian proportion has some fluctuation but, It was relatively rose.
Turn to the bar graph, the beginning of the time period, the number of travellers in travelling overseas was approximately 5 million which was the least proportion of the given period. When 1990, travellers of abroad in japan had been steadily climbed to more than 11 million After 1990, It was dropped town to nearest 10.5 million. However, in 1995, it was represented as the greatest quantity of overseas tourists just under 16 million.
Furthermore, according to the line graph, the Australian portion of the Japaneese errant market was sharply went up till 1988, after that, it was decreased to nearest 4%. Again, it had been increased slightly till 1994 which was the peaked year of the given time period and it was displayed more than 6 percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...5 to 1995 and the units are measured in million while line graph demonstrates the Austr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...some fluctuation but, It was relatively rose. Turn to the bar graph, the beginning...
^^^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...steadily climbed to more than 11 million After 1990, It was dropped town to neare...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, so, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.109375 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74170149421 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552083333333 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.3437726099 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.142857143 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199613423447 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094737776205 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752550566937 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132435380692 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776231494363 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.