The government should spend money on railway rather than roads. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement.
The transport was the major part of sustainable development in the country. All countries had been various transport systems such as high way, railway, airline and waterway which is transport ship or boat across the river or sea so These were not an excellent condition that means delivery path and transport modes such as buses and trains. However, It is often said that The governments spend more money on building the railway rather than constructing a highway. I believe that It is entirely straightforward and I strongly agree with this assertion.
Furthermore, I glad to say, I have a plethora of reasons for positively this announcement. Firstly, The train can transport a lot of passengers with the cheapest ticket than the bus. Many countries people usually used public transport because the modern world, The train system was improved with the electronic train without train drivers and very past also low cost. As an example, In my country, The cost of travel by train from Matara to Colombo was approximately Rs200 but the cost of the bus from the same path was nearest rs350. Hence, the government should spend a lot of money on developing railway system with modern technology.
Secondly, It is a good solution to traffic problems on the road and also air pollution. Beginning of a new society most of the people have private vehicles by this created a not necessary traffic problem on the highway and disturbed in your way so improving train systems many people could use it rather than private vehicles and buses. It was the best solution for developing countries.
To sum up, considering the above paragraphs, I can say clearly, The governments should spend more money on reconstruction and building railway system, therefore, we can reach many benefits as a country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from Matara to Colombo was approximately Rs200 but the cost of the bus from the s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01006711409 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81765717011 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563758389262 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7565567553 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.846153846 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201675784291 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801036515054 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917958133305 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121063482152 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427932557707 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.