Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Some experts believe that, railways should be invested by government more than road. Although railways need enough for promoting, I think, governments should concentrate on both ways of transportation.
The privileges of railways have been revealed recently. People this days are more motivated to apply trains especially for transferring the staffs, why, the costs of train is so less than other transportation mode. In other words, a train could carry a huge amount of load in the same time. In addition recently and with increasing the speed pace of modern trains, it has become more popular rather than past. Also, railways are known as a safest mode of transporting due to rate of annual accident index. All positive identities which has been mentioned, need a specific infrastructure. So that a good investment should be applied.
On the other hand, roads also have their benefits. First of all, roads are the easiest transportation mode for moving. In addition roads is an early returns infrastructure in compare to other modes. Moreover for near-distance destination there has not been any other alternative which was beneficial as well as roads, also people are more eager to go and come on roads for short tracks. In other words, roads make a situation for people who are to travel by their own, in fact road is more pleasant for travelling because of stopping anywhere which traveler want to be.
In conclusion, I could infer, railways because of volume of transportation and costs should be considered more, nevertheless, roads is so important for people, especially for near destination and sightseeing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 64, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ays have been revealed recently. People this days are more motivated to apply trains...
^^^^
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...uge amount of load in the same time. In addition recently and with increasing the speed ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 439, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... than past. Also, railways are known as a safest mode of transporting due to rate...
^
Line 2, column 590, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tioned, need a specific infrastructure. So that a good investment should be applied. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...iest transportation mode for moving. In addition roads is an early returns infrastructur...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...n mode for moving. In addition roads is an early returns infrastructure in compare to ot...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...frastructure in compare to other modes. Moreover for near-distance destination there has...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16730038023 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00257952684 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593155893536 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.4493926106 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109449060439 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429022149887 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475068917129 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868449094235 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635714945206 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.