Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
There are a lot of debates about how solve the traffic issue and its pollution. some people suggest increasing the price of petrol. I partially believe that it could be effective in some way.
Due to growth of technology and increase the number of vehicle factories through the whole world, access of people to automobile have been rising. It leads to grow the volume of traffic jams and finally pollutant weather. If the petrol cost increase, more people would encourage to use public transportation. So the number of single ride vehicle are dramatically decreased. Through this way the huge volume of pollution is declined.
On the other hand, the high rise of gas price just forces on weak level while rich people do not care about such a problem. In addition, this action has its own consequence. For example, increasing the cost of transportation in each part which lead to inflation in society. It increases the amount of dissatisfaction among people. I think, various approach could be influenced like making culture via educating different aged groups, making strict obligations on traffic time, improving the quality of transportation facilities or even increasing the cost of automobiles.
In conclusion, it is must be considered, preventing the problem of traffic and pollution would not solve just by raising the cost of gas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...ve the traffic issue and its pollution. some people suggest increasing the price of ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 279, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...t increase, more people would encourage to use public transportation. So the number of...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...olve just by raising the cost of gas.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 219.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1598173516 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93225356427 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639269406393 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.8226709014 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7142857143 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6428571429 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190351894608 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603136396798 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399855060118 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11426237864 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292044504742 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.