The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land become less productive and the table shows how these cause affected three regions of the world during 1990s.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart and table describe the reasons of destruction of farming land in three different areas in 1990s. Averagely over grazing has been known as a main cause of drop in productivity of agricultural land with devastating the 35% of agricultural area.
Over-grazing, over-cultivation- deforestation and other is introduced as a most important devastating parameters which decrease the beneficial of agriculture. First of all, Europe region suffer again 23% total land degraded, while, just 5% of agricultural land degraded in North America and 13% degradation noted in Oceania. Deforestation was the most significant cause of agricultural land demolishment in Europe by 9.8% and over-grazing by 11.3% introduced as a main reason in Oceania, while, Over-cultivation but had not any effect on agriculture productivity there. In North America over cultivation and deforestation had the most and the least effect respectively.
Totally, apart from over-grazing, Europe had the most percentage of degradation by introduced variable, in comparing with other two areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...f farming land in three different areas in 1990s. Averagely over grazing has been known ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, while, apart from, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.59667815491 2.65546596893 135% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8885415756 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161590774242 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868404731514 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845193176934 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120781932974 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109079636232 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.