The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant.
Given graph illustrate the over aged 65 percentage in three different countries, from 1940 to 2040.
As shown in 1940, USA, had the maximum expectancy over aged 65. Nevertheless, it is predicted that, japan will be the first country due to this amount in 2040.
The percentage of people who was over aged 65, in 1940, was less than 10 percent for all three countries. Sweden and USA experienced an increasing trend in expectancy over aged 65, among people closely until 2000 to 15% and after this year, proportion of aged 65 and over people was constant in Sweden. Nevertheless, graph anticipate that, after 2020, proportion of population aged 65 and over in Sweden well increase dramatically near to USA percentage (about 25%).
On the other hand, over aged 65 population in japan, experienced a different changes. At first until 1960 percentage of over aged 65 decreased, then, after a steady proportion within 1960 to 1985, population of over aged 65 grew. Graph also expects, just near 2030, japan will see a stunning rise in expectancy over aged 65 among its people, and until 2040 will be the first country, whereas, in 1940 japan with about 5% was at the end list.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
...ation in japan, experienced a different changes. At first until 1960 percentage of over...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...apan with about 5% was at the end list.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, nevertheless, so, then, well, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81683168317 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6429199719 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519801980198 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7123073657 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305347666682 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167350096129 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080328701785 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231515592321 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802325533238 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.