Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults.
There are two different ideas. One of them focuses on competition and other concentrate on co-operation between children. According to psychological study different negative and positive points is identified for both of this attitudes. One of them encourage the successfully and other make a responsible person that both will be useful for society. But nowadays some new approach is introduced for children nurturing. New views is according to a stable social skills upbringing and involve more ability of children to make them better than usual.
In competition attitude, children learn to attempt for successfully without attending to other people. The aim is introduced as an important thing and you should use all socio-persona ability to achieve your purpose, so that in this idea children don’t learn to attend to other people.
In contrast co-operating view is introduced. This idea try to make person engage in social affair but children will never learn to effort for their own, therefore desiring to progress is eliminated and society is exposed with static. In other word this view don’t have any plan for motivation and trying.
Nowadays friendly rivalry is introduced as a more useful approach in nurturing of children. In this attitude children will be found to try in to way, one; group aims and two; personal aims. Also this view teach children that personal aim should be located in group purposes. So due to this approach people will learn to try according to group aim why receiving to group goal is as a personal aims. In addition people know that they have a specific goal so that they will be motivated to effort more for personal achievement. Therefore the society will never be static and all people have a special and a mutual purpose to arrive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...sitive points is identified for both of this attitudes. One of them encourage the su...
^^^^
Line 1, column 461, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
...w views is according to a stable social skills upbringing and involve more ability of ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...;t learn to attend to other people. In contrast co-operating view is introduced. This i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...one; group aims and two; personal aims. Also this view teach children that personal ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 402, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...to group goal is as a personal aims. In addition people know that they have a specific g...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 526, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...o effort more for personal achievement. Therefore the society will never be static and al...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 631, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...special and a mutual purpose to arrive.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07482993197 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79049244266 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482993197279 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2215318741 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7647058824 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2941176471 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.17647058824 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238625792368 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900755859254 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601189953187 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149074878487 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439388821241 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.