The charts below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six area of the world.
Summarize the information by selecting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The six pie graph depict the diverse usage of water in six regions of the earth.
Overall, while in North America and Europe, industry is the main consumer of water, in other areas water is used in agriculture more than other purpose. In addition the percentage of water used for agriculture in central Asia is more than the like purpose in other areas.
Europe by more 50% of water resource is the first region whereas central Asia apply just 5% of water resource in industry. In addition, in Europe just 32% of water is consumed by agricultural activity, which it is less than any other area. Consumption patter in North America is so close to Europe by, 48%, 39% and 13% for industrial, agricultural and domestic purposes respectively.
The lowest usage of water in domestic activity, belong to central Asia and south east Asia (7%), south America but use more than 19% of water resource, highest amount for this purpose among the so-called regions. Although in Africa percentage of agricultural usage of water is less than central Asia by 84%, percentage two other purpose is more than Asia by 2%.
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 56
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say these are not the only reasons why some should learn a foreign language.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The three pie charts below show the change in the annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981. 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 73
- Competitiveness is considered to be a positive quality among people.How does competitiveness affect individuals?Is competitiveness a positive or negative qualities? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The six pie graph depict the diverse usa...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...agriculture more than other purpose. In addition the percentage of water used for agricu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 149, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the highest'.
Suggestion: , the highest
... but use more than 19% of water resource, highest amount for this purpose among the so-ca...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86842105263 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55185012455 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484210526316 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3215143362 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182725975107 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995387528831 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388216552242 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127405993241 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347267721822 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.