The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the material status of adults Americans in two of the years.
The first bar chart shown the number of Americans who get married and divorced through 1970 and 2000. The second bar chart illustrated marital status of adults in the USA at the first and the end of the period which means in 1970 and 2000.
As is observed, in the first diagram, the rates of both of getting married and divorced stayed relatively steady over the whole of period. In second graph, the percentage of marriage was the highest amount. While the divorce rate had the lowest amount in each year.
In first chart, in 1970 and 1980, the amount of marriage kept fix at 2.5 million. While, the tendency to be coupled slightly decreased to 2.25 and 2 million in 1990 and 2000 respectively. The marriage rate was approximately doubled of the divorce rate over the whole period of study. The trend toward getting divorce stayed at 1 million in each three years of 1970, 1990 and 2000. Meanwhile, it just reached to 1.5 million in 1980.
In second chart, the rates of married declined from 70 to 60 percent in 1970 and 2000, respectively. The percentage of being single increase but not very much from 15 to 20. Nevertheless, the percentage of being widowed or divorced kept under 10.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...age of marriage was the highest amount. While the divorce rate had the lowest amount ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eing widowed or divorced kept under 10.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, nevertheless, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70142180095 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45905350465 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516587677725 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1676434195 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.3076923077 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2307692308 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270845838032 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968984373026 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689244514717 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167109007814 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637947667823 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.