The chart below chows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in UK, divided into three categories from 1995-2002.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The given chart describe the billion minutes of telecommunication due to three diverse classifications between 1995 and 2002.
Overall, while number of minutes of mobiles (all calls) and national and international – fixed online increase continuously, billion minutes of local – fixed line call type has the fluctuated trend.
The popularity of Local – fixed line, increased firstly from 72 billion minutes in 1995 to 90 billion minutes in 1995, but after that time by increasing the usage of other call sorts, it arrive at 72 billion minutes again in 2002, nevertheless, local fixed line had the maximum share of number of minutes of telephone calls among this years.
Although the billion minutes of mobile call had the highest growth rate from 1995, it was still at the end list. Billion minutes usage of mobiles (all calls) was less than 5 in 1995, but after 1999, it experienced a dramatic rise and reach at 45 in 2002. The billion minutes usage of national and international – fixed line calls, grew from 38 in 1995 to 58 in 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 124, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...l – fixed online increase continuously, billion minutes of local – fixed line call type...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'arrives'?
Suggestion: arrives
...asing the usage of other call sorts, it arrive at 72 billion minutes again in 2002, ne...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ber of minutes of telephone calls among this years. Although the billion minutes o...
^^^^
Line 4, column 114, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a Billion'.
Suggestion: A Billion
...rom 1995, it was still at the end list. Billion minutes usage of mobiles all calls was ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.48453608247 27% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 26.3917525773 125% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 937.175257732 93% => OK
No of words: 178.0 206.0 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87640449438 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70137690674 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 127.690721649 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511235955056 0.622605031667 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 290.88556701 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 16.3608247423 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.0609529557 44.8134815571 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.666666667 76.5299724578 189% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 16.8248392259 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 4.34317383033 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 2.54639175258 157% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262810730355 0.216113520407 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157850641571 0.0766984524023 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033097927658 0.0603063233224 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182272373112 0.12726935374 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327207039397 0.0580467560999 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 8.37731958763 196% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 70.7449484536 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 7.45979381443 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 8.71597938144 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 7.59969072165 101% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 41.2886597938 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 8.62886597938 220% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 8.54432989691 159% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.