The table below show the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbish. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfy they were with their visit during the same two periods.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The table describe the number of people who visited the Ashdown museum during the one year before and one year after it was reconstructed. In addition two given pie charts depict the amount of fulfilment of visitor, according to result of a related poll, which was done in mentioned years.
Overall, after refurbishing, total number of people who visited the Ashdown museum increased. Although predominant of visitor was dissatisfied before restoring the museum, after that, most participant to survey was fulfilled.
Due to results of a poll of visitor satisfaction, during the one year before refurbishment of Ashdown museum, 74000 people visited there, which 40% of them were dissatisfied and 30% was satisfied, but After restoring, with growing the number of visitor to 92000, the percentage of people who were dissatisfied decreased stunningly to 15%.
In the first noted year just 15% of visitors were very satisfied, while in second mentioned year, 35% of respondents to survey, opted very satisfied. No respondent visitor for both years was identical (5%) and very dissatisfied people reduce from 10% to 5%. In addition the percentage of satisfied people also experienced an increase from 30% before restoring to 40% after restoring.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'describes'.
Suggestion: describes
The table describe the number of people who visited the As...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...one year after it was reconstructed. In addition two given pie charts depict the amount ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...isfied people reduce from 10% to 5%. In addition the percentage of satisfied people also...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31979695431 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92863048159 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53807106599 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1490427864 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398282553209 0.215688989381 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179183738826 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870578062015 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266238705463 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623738835073 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.