As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing.
What factor contribute to job satisfaction?
How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all job?
Nowadays an extreme volume of adult life is passed in job and fulfilment is introduced as a significant parameter in individual wellbeing. We are to investigate the different variables which are able to improve job fulfilment and in the following realize the job fulfilment expectation realistically.
Different parameter influence on job satisfaction, which salary and perks could be introduced as a most important. Normally all people work for money to be able afford their life expense, so that if they were not able to gain a decent salary they would always be in stress, furthermore rarely could they have individual wellbeing. On the other hand perks also is defined as a good stimulus for doing job. In other word people who take enough privilege from their work, are more motivated for working more, specially, if perks is paid according to competency.
Although it is important for worker to be fulfilling of their job, they should have a realistic definition of job satisfaction. In other word populace should realize their capability and due to it expect a situation. Take as an illustration, unskilled people should not envisage the same condition which accomplished people are looking for. In addition a supervisor has more expert than a subordinary, thus are more expected. So that I think skill and education are the important parameter which could persuade us to anticipate a situation as well as possible. On the whole, the level of effort on everybody could be known as a best index for his/her realized satisfaction definition.
In conclusion I could say salary and perks could be defined as a most important variable in job satisfaction and we should expect a fulfilment due to our effort.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...accomplished people are looking for. In addition a supervisor has more expert than a sub...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...f effort on everybody could be known as a best index for his/her realized satisfa...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, so, thus, well, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08156028369 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04120760802 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517730496454 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4235439821 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.230769231 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332300690297 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118180576939 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771155603956 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21486803604 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261016333096 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.