Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in future such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both this view and give your own opinion.
Recently, the field of study in university has become a controversial issue among the people. Some people insist of usefulness of major and its future, while others, like me, say that, tendency of student should be considered firstly.
When people want to opt a subject for studying, they should be care about its future and also should be assure that this field is utilitarian. It is not deniable that, the major of study may create the best situation for career of everybody. In fact a large percentage of people, opt their future job by choosing a field for study. In addition people who have a decent knowledge and skill are will be a better member for society, so that if people are to become an impressive character for their nation, they should be careful about the usefulness and future of their selected major.
Conversely, I think although the usefulness of field study is important, hardly could anybody be successful in subject that is not based on their character. In other words, if people are not enthusiastic about their university subject, they will not be able to use their knowledge in approach of their society needs. Apart from all thing has been said, I think our interesting come from our talent, in addition we will be high-level in a specific subject, if we opted it due to our interest. This fact cause to rear a responsible person instead of irresponsible, why people who do a work by loving never forget what may destroy their interesting.
In conclusion, I could infer, future of a university subject may be considered important, nevertheless, people will not be able to use their knowledge and skill unless they like it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 64, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cared'?
Suggestion: cared
... a subject for studying, they should be care about its future and also should be ass...
^^^^
Line 6, column 105, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'assured'?
Suggestion: assured
...are about its future and also should be assure that this field is utilitarian. It is n...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 336, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...e job by choosing a field for study. In addition people who have a decent knowledge and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 509, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rearing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: rearing
...it due to our interest. This fact cause to rear a responsible person instead of irrespo...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wledge and skill unless they like it.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, while, apart from, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88028169014 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74693026265 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514084507042 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.4088815478 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2727272727 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3526900891 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140671601756 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858146945744 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233613228617 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198577842106 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.