some people believe that robots will play an important role in future society, while others argue that robots maight have negative effect on society
discuss both view and give your opinion
There are two attitude about robots role in future societies. Some people consider robots as a privilege of our future. Conversely I think robots will lay negative influence on our future life.
Nowadays people are able to sense the effect of robot more than past, which a part of society think, automatic machineries will play a giant role in future. In fact they think with growing the artificial intelligence, accuracy of doing works will be improved, furthermore not only will robots be able to reduce the volume of hard work that the human have to do, but also the living of people is facilitated by involving the robots in people ordinary activities. For instance artificial intelligence and automatic devices could be replaced instead of a seller or people will be able to consider them as an assistant for housekeeping, if populaces are used to applying them.
In contrast we think never could robots do the sentimental activities. In other word artificial intelligence and autonomy machines will not be able to expose emotion as a human. Take as an illustration, it is possible for robots to cook according to an approximate receipt, but their cooking will never become delicious, inasmuch as which make a food pleasant is sensation of cooker not ingredients. In addition we should not forget that, all manmade are accompanied with a percentage of error, and sometimes this error could threat the life and health of people, likewise robots are not except. In other word, whatever robots become closer to our life, we are going to danger more.
On the whole I could infer, although some people consider robots as a positive characteristic of future, others, including me think rarely will robot activities be replaced rather human activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...er robots as a privilege of our future. Conversely I think robots will lay negative influe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...atic machineries will play a giant role in future. In fact they think with growing the ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...opulaces are used to applying them. In contrast we think never could robots do the sent...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put before the verb 'think'.
Suggestion: never think
... used to applying them. In contrast we think never could robots do the sentimental activit...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...sensation of cooker not ingredients. In addition we should not forget that, all manmade ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put before the verb 'think'.
Suggestion: rarely think
...eristic of future, others, including me think rarely will robot activities be replaced rathe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, furthermore, if, likewise, so, for instance, i think, in addition, in contrast, in fact, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05517241379 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8209678642 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565517241379 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.0371483261 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.166666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281032115152 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119803804923 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528646796394 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191538457778 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536798441928 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.