The three pie charts below show the change in the annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981. 1991 and 2001.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
Given pie charts describe the annual school expenses by different elements in UK, in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
It is clear that, the main school spending belong to teachers’ salaries in diverse so-called years.
In 1981 and 1991, insurance had 2 and 3% of total school spending respectively, while in 2001 this variable increased dramatically to 8%. Nevertheless insurance had the minimum share of total school spending for three years. On the other hand, teacher salaries was identified as the dominant variable in total annual spending for all three years which, 40% in 1981, 50% in 1991 and 45% in 2001.
Other worker salaries, resources (e.g. books) and furniture and equipment was the other important parameters which had more the 40% share of total school spending. With passing the time the percentage of other worker salaries decreased in 1991 and 2001 with regard to 1981. Resources percentage grow up firstly from 1981 to 1991 and then diminished in 2001. The maximum and minimum percentage of total annual school spending related to furniture and equipment was in 2001 and 1991 respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
... variable increased dramatically to 8%. Nevertheless insurance had the minimum share of tota...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., first, firstly, if, nevertheless, so, then, while, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70287341386 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516666666667 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3312288807 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26572590935 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131731832197 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725601399366 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184188941827 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766456341164 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.