In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.
Working and travelling have extremely recommended because of their effect on lifelong of people. Working expose people to each other and made their living more and more social. In other side journey make people more familiar with different society’s conventions and could create long insight for travelers.
Normally, the young after high school become independent and need to be experienced, therefore every thing should be used to improve the life skills of their for future living. One of important way for this purpose is traveling. The young during the trip will have to manage their money and time if they want to have an enjoyable vacation. In addition they will learn to communicate with other people without any close knit to eliminate their needs. Also travelling aware people of different culture and life routes so that could make their brain more useful. But it don’t be forgotten that travelling have a specific danger such as transporting hazard, accommodation hazard, communication hazard and … that one of them could affect on the young.
Traditionally work is known as a base of men. Nowadays people are encouraged to work, why as this way people can have a sense of usefulness. In addition during the working humans have great communication and friendly relation that make their living extremely enjoyable why men have basically a sociality inherent. But in contrast working for young people may change their live and identified as a new approach alternate to education, so that it can alter living routes of young.
There are many advantages and disadvantages in travelling and working for the young before starting education study. Among all of reason positive or negative, it has been seemed that travelling and working may be good if all of bad situation is eliminated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...made their living more and more social. In other side journey make people more f...
^^
Line 2, column 344, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... want to have an enjoyable vacation. In addition they will learn to communicate with oth...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 452, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...y close knit to eliminate their needs. Also travelling aware people of different cu...
^^^^
Line 2, column 733, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ion hazard and … that one of them could affect on the young. Traditionally work is know...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 742, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and … that one of them could affect on the young. Traditionally work is known ...
^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ople can have a sense of usefulness. In addition during the working humans have great co...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, in addition, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15646258503 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78179726772 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557823129252 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7990654104 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.066666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235039329702 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848433679274 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055413178301 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149853730123 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267392648721 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.