There are so many opinions here. I think we should decide it in every area. In some cases we should these children should be competitive. In some other cases, these children should learn how to co-operate. There are some reasons in the following paragraphs.
First of all, some area is poverty, we should teach them a sense of competition. If they want to become a strong man, they should overtake other classmates and fight for more chances. These children should know if they do not want to fight for the chance, they will lose the chance. Because their money is less than wealthy peers, these rich classmates have better education and learn more knowledge. Even if these wealthy peers can go to a better private school. The poorer children can only go to public schools. If they want to get more chances, they need to learn harder than other students. Attention, Harvard University has very expensive tuition, if the poor student wants to get a better chance like this, they should be more powerful than other students, they might get a scholarship to go to this university. This is an example, In fact, there are many other things that should be achieved beyond their peers.
Secondly, for wealthy children, they should be taught to cooperate rather than compete to become more useful adults. Usually, these children have a way out, and they have a chance to try again in many things. If they cooperate, they will get more opportunities to achieve greater goals, such as being the boss of a company. Do more creative things by co-operating with others.
To sum up, different situations should use different methods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ter education and learn more knowledge. Even if these wealthy peers can go to a better ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, i think, in fact, such as, first of all, in some cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8381294964 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48856657832 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543165467626 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3469208894 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.7894736842 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6315789474 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15789473684 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306685477644 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105697431493 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838713128367 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193858919739 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880378062634 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.2 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 9.78957915832 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.