Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
These days, on the whole countries have the same of issues specifically developing traffic and pollution problems. As a response of this, society and government in some countries unanimous to increase price of oil. I think that rising oil prices is the most proper course of action to solving this problematic.
First of all, there are many the strong arguments supporting above way. Firstly, vapor has dangerous compound which it sourced by petrol. Many motorcycles in the road scatter pollution which having side effect on the around environment. A case in point, in Jakarta, cloud become black colour because it reasoned by contraction of transport. Secondly, ground transportation like car and motorcycle are making density in the some road. In some public areas are not friendly for rest area because too crowded by public transport. For instance, many of places play children in XXI has been full with transport. As a result, the main reason those problems are on the petrol user, so increasing cost of oil is able to become the best solution.
In contrast, all of transport user need gas, and they are not care on the consequences of pollution by petrol. The negative effect is making atmosphere not clean. Its due to most of them, has been habit use oil without using the other alternative. Therefore in their opinion highly fee of gas are not the best way to finish traffic and pollution problems. It is important that on the contra argument only will add traffic and pollution problems.
In conclusion, petrol have become the main need to the users everywhere else. However, we must look for the other alternative to change petrol, probably we are able to use electric, which having practiced by the modern country. I believe that raising price of oil is going to become the best step to decrease pollution and traffic problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...nd motorcycle are making density in the some road. In some public areas are not frie...
^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...il without using the other alternative. Therefore in their opinion highly fee of gas are ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, first of all, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96129032258 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67734939668 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570967741935 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2526415376 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.9473684211 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3157894737 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.31578947368 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218658454352 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640642821593 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595931174497 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132806049796 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278749649837 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.