Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
Currently, the environment problems like increasing transportation and pollution problems become the focus on the world. Therefore the best way to decrease this issue is increasing price of petrol.
There is no doubt that many people are going to stop use transportation, if cost of oil sharp increase. Firstly, the main reason people's interest are using by transportation, because fee of petrol cheaper. Its because price of influencing on the everyone's for using transportation. For example, in the developed countries, there is a policy on the cost of gas must consistently increase every year, it makes transportation user decreasing. Secondly, the air pollution is resulted by unworthy transportation. Its due to many of user too extravagant uses petrol, notably on the unworthiness transport. As an example, said by a famous scientist, the main logic that pollution just vanished by cost of oil which expensive, because the user will more choose walking without by transportation.
Nevertheless, many of user disagree with increasing fee of petrol, and most of them, prefer stable price or cheaper. For instance, there has been a people group on the some countries reject and criticize the price of oil, if experiencing increase. Its because most of they have the habit with cheaper cost. Therefore in their opinion highly fee of gas are not the best way to finish traffic and pollution problems. It is important that on the contra argument only will add traffic and pollution problems.
To sum up, it is clear that price of gas is able to decide environment condition, because transportation user influenced by fee of petrol. I believe that raising price of oil is going to become the best step to decrease pollution problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...problems become the focus on the world. Therefore the best way to decrease this issue is ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...rtation, because fee of petrol cheaper. Its because price of influencing on the eve...
^^^
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to walk'.
Suggestion: to walk
...sive, because the user will more choose walking without by transportation. Neverthel...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...e, there has been a people group on the some countries reject and criticize the pric...
^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...price of oil, if experiencing increase. Its because most of they have the habit wit...
^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... they have the habit with cheaper cost. Therefore in their opinion highly fee of gas are ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, no doubt, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18085106383 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1225594061 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514184397163 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8884834517 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3125 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219054722586 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821154778235 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702260855577 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162780372232 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707844535365 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.