Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
These days, on the whole countries have the same of issues specifically developing traffic and pollution problems. As a response of this, society and government in some countries unanimous to increase price of oil. I think that rising oil prices is the most proper course of action to solving this problematic.
First of all, there are many the strong arguments supporting above way. Firstly, vapor has dangerous compound which it is sourced by petrol. Many motorcycles in the road scatter pollution which having side effect on the around environment. A case in point, in Jakarta, cloud become black colour because it is reasoned by contraction of transport. Secondly, ground transportation like car and motorcycle are making density in the some road. In some public areas are not friendly for rest area because too crowded by public transport. For instance, many of places play children in XXI has been full with transport.
In contrast, many user of transport disagree with increasing fee of petrol, and most of them, prefer stable price or cheaper. For example, there has been a people group on the some countries reject and criticize the price of oil, if too expensive. Its because most of they have the habit with cheaper cost. Therefore in their opinion highly fee of gas are not the best way to finish traffic and pollution problems. It is important that on the contra argument only will add traffic and pollution problems.
To sum up, it is clear that price of gas is able to decide environment condition, because transportation user to get influencing pollution and the other problem. I believe that raising price of oil is going to become the best step to decrease pollution and traffic problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...nd motorcycle are making density in the some road. In some public areas are not frie...
^^^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun user seems to be countable; consider using: 'many users'.
Suggestion: many users
...en full with transport. In contrast, many user of transport disagree with increasing f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...e, there has been a people group on the some countries reject and criticize the pric...
^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ize the price of oil, if too expensive. Its because most of they have the habit wit...
^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... they have the habit with cheaper cost. Therefore in their opinion highly fee of gas are ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in contrast, first of all, on the whole, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71585380688 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56993006993 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.7028899002 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.1176470588 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244251089569 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755150836237 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062711320178 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153091317552 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672471484972 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.