Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?
Currently, it is believe that in this essay, I am absolutely in agreement more advantages than disadvantages to people doing anything, in the home, with using machines rather than by hands. In my opinion, most people prefer do an anything of using machine like finishing of working home.
On the one hand, the main profit of this problem is development machine helping everyone, if all of people prefer use machines than by hands, actually it gives simplicity to everyone's working. In the period modern, machine gives positive effect to many people. Its because, they needn't focus on the one work, they can focus of the other work in jointly. For example, when finishing our working two or more jobs by jointly, just using machine all of working is finished by together. This development technology one of choice to economizing of expanding. Its due to, we must not pay many labor or do many things. As an example, an industry company in general use the modern machine to minimalism cost of operationally. As the result, in the present all of influences machine useful must accept very well.
On the other hand, there is it some trouble doing of working by hands. These problems bring the negative effect today, if mechanical technology rejected by most people. Because of many people have bustle outside house, thus have not more time doing something in home. On several case, some families do not of something in home, like assignment to cleaning their home. Whereas, until now some work which done by hands, it is able to finished by machine. So there is no doubt, for starting of finishing everything it just uses the modern machine.
In conclusion, even though many challenge when done anything by hands, like finishing of something faster. The best solution is change of using by hands, becoming of using by machine. So, this social transformation are making of something be more easy without complicating ourself.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
Currently, it is believe that in this essay, I am absolutely in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...e gives positive effect to many people. Its because, they neednt focus on the one w...
^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: needn't
...ffect to many people. Its because, they neednt focus on the one work, they can focus o...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun labor seems to be countable; consider using: 'many labors'.
Suggestion: many labors
... expanding. Its due to, we must not pay many labor or do many things. As an example, an in...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun case seems to be countable; consider using: 'several cases'.
Suggestion: several cases
...t more time doing something in home. On several case, some families do not of something in h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun challenge seems to be countable; consider using: 'many challenges'.
Suggestion: many challenges
... machine. In conclusion, even though many challenge when done anything by hands, like finis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in general, no doubt, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95679012346 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65617936667 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521604938272 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9035870336 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5263157895 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0526315789 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241141877678 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690717136203 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390909503023 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149181373831 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287230800164 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.