the chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.
The given bar graph illustrates information about the number of male and female in britain in additional education over a three decades period. Overall, both men and women participated more in the over-time than portion-time education, although the total people who selected the part-time education increased every decades.
According to the chart, it's clear that the percentage of the women of the full-time went up between 1970/71 and 1990/91. They're started at the fewest number around 750 thousands in 1970/71 before followed by slight incline in 1980/81 become 820 thousands. The graph continued to jumped sharply until rose the peak at 1100 thousands in last decades. On other hand, the total of women who took the portion-time course in first, second, and third decades measured was 50, 200, 250 thousands, respectively
On the contrary, in the man's case, the total of men who chosen to do over-time course was not inclined every decades, even though still higher than the portion-time. It was began with the highest value at 1000 thousand in first decade, meanwhile the portion-time started at the lowest at 100 thousands.Then, there was a significant decline in second decade followed by small increase in third became 850 and 900, orderly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: They're
...me went up between 1970/71 and 1990/91. Theyre started at the fewest number around 750...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'begun'.
Suggestion: begun
...ll higher than the portion-time. It was began with the highest value at 1000 thousand...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
... started at the lowest at 100 thousands.Then, there was a significant decline in sec...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, still, then, third, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21782178218 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78039828903 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638613861386 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.8753004903 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.571428571 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243413515812 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111326001706 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867718565918 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179601718756 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0948630319487 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.