The bar diagram indicates the changes in number of male and female candidates in higher education, over a period of 20 years, in Britain. The graph clearly shows the significant changes in the trend of further education. However, all the time, among both the genders people preferred part-time studies.
Overall, the number of men pursuing higher education remain almost change whereas that of women change greatly. Over time, men started preferring full-time education and therefore the reduction in the part-time male students was approximately compensated by the full-time male students.
A steady growth in the number of female students can be observed both in part-time and full-time students indicating that more women have come into higher education. The number of women in part-time education is increased very sharply, reaching almost 11 lakhs from 7 lakhs during the peroid of 1970 to 1991.
However, the number of full-time students is rising for both genders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, therefore, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41176470588 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69591799879 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562091503268 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6843385905 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308203956825 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138843518279 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546560229653 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198028058056 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477605592814 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.