The line diagram shows the proportion of materials being recycled within a country, from 1982 to 2010.
The recycling rate have been increasing for materials except for papers and cardboards, whose percentage of recycling shows a downward trend.
Plastics and aluminium cans were recycling with an increasing rate from the time it has started, with aluminium cans having a sharp rise in the rate. The change in the rate of recycling of plastics is very low.
The rate of recycling of glass containers declined by 10% in a span of 8 years, from 1978, which was retained by 1990. However, this rise continued after that and about 60% of glass containers are being recycled by 2010.
The rate of recycling of papers and cardboards had showed a fluctuating nature in earlier days and started showing a steady change after 1990. If the percentage of papers and cardboards being recycled was 65% in 1978 it could become only 70% by 2010, even though there was peak of 80% in 1990. Still the rate of recycling have always been higher for papers and cardboards in comparison with other materials.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 295, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...n though there was peak of 80% in 1990. Still the rate of recycling have always been ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88770053476 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56850436555 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8930939725 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.555555556 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247949445729 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122016047961 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119041658852 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177614082872 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137027628098 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.