The chart below shows the number of passengers who used public transport in Somewhere town from 2012 to 2015
The bar chart illustrates the number of passengers traveling by three different mean of public transport in Somewhere town over a three year period between 2012 and 2015.
Overall there were considerable upward trend for the number of people using tram for traveling while this figure of two other types of vehicle fluctuated over the period given. Another interesting is that there were large gaps between the preference of residents to different transports in 2012.
Looking at details, in 2012 train was the most popular public transport with 80,000 passengers which was four times higher compared to the tram’s figure at the same time. This figure for train in the next year fall down dramatically, hit a trough at just 10,000 people. However, the number of people traveling by train was improved steadily in the following years, finishing the period at over 60000 people. By contrast, this figure for tram witnessed a remarkable jump, ranked the first place in 2015 with 95000 passengers.
Similar as train, the number of commuter using bus varied sharply over the period. From 2013 to 2014 this figure surpass other types of vehicle became the most popular public transport used, reached its peak at 70000 passengers in 2014, a sharp rise in comparison with 55000 bus passengers in 2012. However, bus agency experienced immediately a moderate fall by 10000 customers in the next year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'mean' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'means'.
Suggestion: means
...passengers traveling by three different mean of public transport in Somewhere town o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11790393013 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56055362189 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558951965066 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4126792178 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.2 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244735823614 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932128198844 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986169099496 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175310909862 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10646863604 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.